ICBMX vs. IYM
Compare and contrast key facts about ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM).
ICBMX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on May 4, 1997. IYM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2000.
Performance
ICBMX vs. IYM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICBMX vs. IYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 15.65% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 16.42% | 20.41% | -4.54% | 12.83% | -9.15% | 25.62% | 17.87% | 19.22% | -16.63% | 24.83% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ICBMX having a 15.65% return and IYM slightly higher at 16.42%. Over the past 10 years, ICBMX has outperformed IYM with an annualized return of 13.20%, while IYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.13% annualized return.
ICBMX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
IYM
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 16.42%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICBMX vs. IYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IYM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICBMX vs. IYM — Risk / Return Rank
ICBMX
IYM
ICBMX vs. IYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICBMX | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.55 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 2.15 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.38 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 8.81 | +2.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICBMX | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.55 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.44 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.52 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.33 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICBMX and IYM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICBMX vs. IYM - Dividend Comparison
ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than IYM's 1.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.65% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
ICBMX vs. IYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, smaller than the maximum IYM drawdown of -67.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and IYM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICBMX | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.92% | -67.78% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -14.54% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -29.94% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.18% | -42.76% | -5.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -5.46% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -11.51% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 3.93% | -0.22% |
Volatility
ICBMX vs. IYM - Volatility Comparison
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) have volatilities of 6.79% and 7.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICBMX | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 7.07% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 14.93% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 22.42% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 20.33% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 21.66% | +0.63% |