PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVD vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVD vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed USL with an annualized return of 8.30%, while USL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.


FVD

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.80%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
8.30%

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.21%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and USL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.26

The correlation between FVD and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FVD vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVD
USL

Financial Services

19.1%
4.5%

Utilities

18.4%

-

Industrials

14.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

11.6%

-

Real Estate

8.1%

-

Healthcare

7.8%

-

Technology

6.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%

-

Energy

4.0%

-

Communication Services

3.0%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Financial Services

FVD
19.1%
USL
4.5%

Utilities

FVD
18.4%
USL

-

Industrials

FVD
14.2%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

FVD
11.6%
USL

-

Real Estate

FVD
8.1%
USL

-

Healthcare

FVD
7.8%
USL

-

Technology

FVD
6.1%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

FVD
5.6%
USL

-

Energy

FVD
4.0%
USL

-

Communication Services

FVD
3.0%
USL

-

Basic Materials

FVD
2.1%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVD vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVDUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.47

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

7.02

-4.44

FVD vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVDUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

2.04

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.58

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.34

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.01

+0.57

Drawdowns

FVD vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-89.06%

+38.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-16.76%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-23.33%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

-33.82%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

-66.02%

+30.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-38.16%

+32.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-61.46%

+56.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

8.27%

-5.61%

Volatility

FVD vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 2.62%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

10.53%

-7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

23.33%

-16.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

28.54%

-19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

30.08%

-17.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

32.35%

-16.91%

FVD vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVD vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.31%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVD and USL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 10-year performance, USL leads with 10.91% vs 8.30% for FVD. On fees, FVD is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USL has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FVD is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVD and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer