PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVD vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVD vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FVD has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 8.54%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.25% annualized return.


FVD

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
3.30%
6M
2.96%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
8.54%

DGRW

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
7.35%
6M
7.02%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
14.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
3.30%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.35%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD and DGRW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FVD and DGRW has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FVD vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVD
DGRW

Financial Services

19.0%
11.3%

Utilities

17.4%
0.2%

Industrials

14.3%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
6.7%

Healthcare

8.2%
12.8%

Real Estate

7.7%

-

Technology

7.3%
32.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
7.1%

Energy

3.6%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
10.1%

Basic Materials

2.9%
3.3%

Financial Services

FVD
19.0%
DGRW
11.3%

Utilities

FVD
17.4%
DGRW
0.2%

Industrials

FVD
14.3%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

FVD
11.1%
DGRW
6.7%

Healthcare

FVD
8.2%
DGRW
12.8%

Real Estate

FVD
7.7%
DGRW

-

Technology

FVD
7.3%
DGRW
32.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FVD
5.7%
DGRW
7.1%

Energy

FVD
3.6%
DGRW
5.0%

Communication Services

FVD
2.9%
DGRW
10.1%

Basic Materials

FVD
2.9%
DGRW
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVD vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVDDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.28

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

9.75

-6.23

FVD vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVD vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-32.04%

-18.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-8.30%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.97%

-16.21%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

-17.27%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

-32.04%

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-2.42%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-3.01%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.94%

+0.86%

Volatility

FVD vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) is 3.12%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that FVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.64%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

8.21%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.73%

10.27%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

14.01%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

16.24%

-0.78%

FVD vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVD has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVD vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

FVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than DGRW's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.29%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.29%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVD and DGRW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to FVD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVD dropped -51.00% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.25% vs 8.54% for FVD. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.29% for DGRW.

FVD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FVD and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVD and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer