DGRW vs. VIG
DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both Dividend funds - DGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index while VIG tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRW returned 14.25%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for VIG. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
DGRW vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGRW having a 7.35% return and VIG slightly higher at 7.53%. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 14.25%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.40% annualized return.
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
DGRW vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 7.35% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -5.38% | 26.90% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.53% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRW and VIG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DGRW and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRW vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRW
VIG
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
DGRW
VIG
Healthcare
DGRW
VIG
Financial Services
DGRW
VIG
Communication Services
DGRW
VIG
Industrials
DGRW
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
DGRW
VIG
Consumer Defensive
DGRW
VIG
Energy
DGRW
VIG
Basic Materials
DGRW
VIG
Utilities
DGRW
VIG
Real Estate
DGRW
-
VIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRW vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
DGRW
VIG
DGRW vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRW | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.57 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 10.39 | -0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRW vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRW | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -46.81% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -7.91% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.21% | -14.95% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -20.39% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.04% | -31.72% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -0.62% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -5.50% | +2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.96% | -0.02% |
Volatility
DGRW vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.82%. This indicates that DGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRW | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 2.82% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 7.68% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 10.14% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 14.23% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 16.07% | +0.17% |
DGRW vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRW vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DGRW and VIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DGRW has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to VIG (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.25% vs 13.40% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 13.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.29% for DGRW.
DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRW and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer