PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 13.79%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.70% annualized return.


DGRW

1D
1.37%
1M
2.07%
6M
6.86%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
13.79%
ALL TIME*
13.05%

SCHD

1D
0.27%
1M
3.61%
6M
13.71%
YTD
24.36%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.74M$49.20M$56.02M
$806.58M$724.91M$690.35M

DGRW vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
10.05%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and SCHD is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRW and SCHD has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRW vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRW
SCHD

Technology

33.8%
12.7%

Healthcare

12.8%
20.8%

Industrials

11.8%
7.8%

Communication Services

11.1%
6.2%

Financial Services

8.4%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
20.6%

Energy

4.5%
14.1%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.2%

Utilities

0.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

DGRW
33.8%
SCHD
12.7%

Healthcare

DGRW
12.8%
SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

DGRW
11.8%
SCHD
7.8%

Communication Services

DGRW
11.1%
SCHD
6.2%

Financial Services

DGRW
8.4%
SCHD
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRW
8.0%
SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

DGRW
6.7%
SCHD
20.6%

Energy

DGRW
4.5%
SCHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

DGRW
2.8%
SCHD
1.2%

Utilities

DGRW
0.2%
SCHD
0.1%

Real Estate

DGRW

-

SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRW vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRWSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.52

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

6.94

-4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

17.53

-8.92

DGRW vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-33.37%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-4.61%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-16.13%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-16.85%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-33.37%

+1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-3.29%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.82%

+0.23%

Volatility

DGRW vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 3.19%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.82%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

7.99%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

11.06%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

14.39%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

16.73%

-0.54%

DGRW vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than SCHD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.12%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and SCHD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to DGRW (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.79% vs 12.70% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.79% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

DGRW is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHD is Dividend. DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer