FVAL vs. JVAL
FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) and JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FVAL tracks the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index while JVAL tracks the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVAL returned 12.53%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for JVAL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JVAL.
Performance
FVAL vs. JVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than JVAL's 19.44% return.
FVAL
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- —
JVAL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
FVAL vs. JVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 11.14% | 19.56% | 18.05% | 23.10% | -14.40% | 30.33% | 9.08% | 30.33% | -7.87% | 6.12% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.44% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVAL and JVAL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FVAL and JVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVAL vs. JVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVAL
JVAL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
FVAL
JVAL
Financial Services
FVAL
JVAL
Consumer Cyclical
FVAL
JVAL
Communication Services
FVAL
JVAL
Healthcare
FVAL
JVAL
Industrials
FVAL
JVAL
Consumer Defensive
FVAL
JVAL
Energy
FVAL
JVAL
Real Estate
FVAL
JVAL
Basic Materials
FVAL
JVAL
Utilities
FVAL
JVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVAL vs. JVAL — Risk / Return Rank
FVAL
JVAL
FVAL vs. JVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVAL | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.51 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 4.73 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.80 | 18.70 | -2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVAL | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.92 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.72 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.67 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FVAL vs. JVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum JVAL drawdown of -40.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and JVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVAL | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.26% | -40.42% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -8.48% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -20.07% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | -22.39% | -1.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.29% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -5.30% | +0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.14% | -0.15% |
Volatility
FVAL vs. JVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 2.70%, while JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVAL | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 4.02% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 10.08% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 13.79% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 17.13% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 19.82% | -1.71% |
FVAL vs. JVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than JVAL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FVAL vs. JVAL - Dividend Comparison
FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than JVAL's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 1.49% | 1.61% | 1.60% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.62% | 0.45% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.72% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVAL and JVAL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JVAL has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FVAL (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVAL dropped -37.26% vs JVAL's -40.42%.
On 5-year performance, FVAL leads with 12.53% vs 12.29% for JVAL. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FVAL has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FVAL.
JVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.49% for FVAL.
FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FVAL and 0.12% for JVAL.
JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVAL and JVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer