JVAL vs. FNDX
JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - JVAL tracks the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index while FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JVAL returned 12.93%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JVAL charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
JVAL vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JVAL achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 14.79% return.
JVAL
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 38.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
JVAL vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.79% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.79% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 9.12% | 28.65% | -7.30% | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between JVAL and FNDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between JVAL and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
JVAL vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JVAL
FNDX
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
JVAL
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
JVAL
FNDX
Financial Services
JVAL
FNDX
Healthcare
JVAL
FNDX
Industrials
JVAL
FNDX
Communication Services
JVAL
FNDX
Energy
JVAL
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
JVAL
FNDX
Real Estate
JVAL
FNDX
Basic Materials
JVAL
FNDX
Utilities
JVAL
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JVAL vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
JVAL
FNDX
JVAL vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JVAL | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.56 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 5.27 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.83 | 20.40 | -2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JVAL vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JVAL drawdown since its inception was -40.42%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JVAL and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JVAL | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.42% | -37.72% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -6.06% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -16.30% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -19.06% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -1.02% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -3.55% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.56% | +0.62% |
Volatility
JVAL vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.29%. This indicates that JVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JVAL | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 3.29% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 7.61% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 10.47% | +3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 15.18% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 17.52% | +2.32% |
JVAL vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JVAL has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JVAL vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
JVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.72% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, JVAL and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JVAL has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to FNDX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JVAL dropped -40.42% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 5-year performance, FNDX leads with 13.48% vs 12.93% for JVAL. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
JVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.
JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JVAL and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JVAL and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer