PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVAL vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FVAL vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FVAL vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
-3.56%19.56%5.50%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-29.48%-11.37%-3.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a -3.56% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -29.48% return.


FVAL

1D
2.86%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
-3.56%
6M
1.74%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*

FETH

1D
3.67%
1M
8.89%
YTD
-29.48%
6M
-49.75%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FVAL vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FVAL vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVAL
FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVAL vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVALFETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.19

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

0.84

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.10

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

0.19

+1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.26

0.38

+6.88

FVAL vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVAL and FETH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVALFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.19

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

-0.35

+1.07

Correlation

The correlation between FVAL and FETH is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FVAL vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
1.71%1.61%1.60%1.69%1.79%1.41%1.61%1.77%2.06%1.62%0.45%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FVAL vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and FETH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FVALFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-64.00%

+26.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-61.74%

+49.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

-56.86%

+50.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-30.47%

+25.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

30.48%

-27.83%

Volatility

FVAL vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 5.12%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 19.25%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FVALFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

19.25%

-14.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

53.53%

-44.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

75.83%

-57.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

74.85%

-58.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

74.85%

-56.64%