PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FETH vs. ETHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FETH vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FETH having a -39.61% return and ETHA slightly lower at -39.63%.


FETH

1D
-1.49%
1M
-19.20%
YTD
-39.61%
6M
-39.16%
1Y
-32.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHA

1D
-1.60%
1M
-19.21%
YTD
-39.63%
6M
-39.23%
1Y
-32.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETH vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.61%-11.37%-4.68%
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
-39.63%-11.31%-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FETH and ETHA is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

1.00

The correlation between FETH and ETHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FETH vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHA
ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETH vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FETHETHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.96

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

-0.49

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

-0.83

0.00

FETH vs. ETHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the ETHA Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FETH and ETHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FETH vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETH drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHA drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETH and ETHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETHETHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.57%

-67.56%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.57%

-67.56%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.06%

-63.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.43%

-33.38%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.69%

39.61%

+0.08%

Volatility

FETH vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) have volatilities of 19.66% and 19.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETHETHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.66%

19.85%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.01%

47.25%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.39%

69.57%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.56%

72.84%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.56%

72.84%

-0.28%

FETH vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FETH and ETHA have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FETH vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FETH nor ETHA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FETH and ETHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ETHA has higher volatility (19.85%) compared to FETH (19.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETH dropped -67.57% vs ETHA's -67.56%.

On 1-year performance, FETH leads with -32.83% vs -32.84% for ETHA. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, FETH has been the lower-risk option at 19.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FETH has performed better with a -32.83% return vs -32.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH and ETHA have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FETH and ETHA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index, while ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

ETHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FETH and ETHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer