PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVAL vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FVAL vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FVAL vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
-3.56%19.56%18.36%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
-22.56%-6.56%99.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a -3.56% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -22.56% return.


FVAL

1D
2.86%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
-3.56%
6M
1.74%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
1.97%
1M
3.29%
YTD
-22.56%
6M
-40.86%
1Y
-17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FVAL vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FVAL vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVAL
FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVAL vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVALFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

-0.40

+1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

-0.29

+1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.97

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

-0.39

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.26

-0.84

+8.10

FVAL vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVAL and FBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVALFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

-0.40

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.35

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between FVAL and FBTC is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FVAL vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
1.71%1.61%1.60%1.69%1.79%1.41%1.61%1.77%2.06%1.62%0.45%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FVAL vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and FBTC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FVALFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-49.33%

+12.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-49.33%

+37.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

-46.06%

+39.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-14.12%

+9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

23.05%

-20.40%

Volatility

FVAL vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 5.12%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FVALFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

12.97%

-7.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

36.77%

-27.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

45.30%

-27.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

51.21%

-34.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

51.21%

-33.00%