FVAL vs. AVLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FVAL tracks the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index while AVLV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FVAL returned 20.96%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for AVLV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

FVAL vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.

FVAL

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 11.14%
• 6M: 12.79%
• 1Y: 31.42%
• 3Y*: 20.96%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: —

AVLV

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 5.75%
• YTD: 20.64%
• 6M: 22.01%
• 1Y: 38.77%
• 3Y*: 23.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVAL vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	11.14%	19.56%	18.05%	23.10%	-14.40%	6.94%
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	20.64%	15.12%	17.49%	17.43%	-5.53%	5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FVAL and AVLV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021	0.91

The correlation between FVAL and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FVAL vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FVAL	AVLV
Technology	32.6%	17.2%
Financial Services	11.4%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	14.1%
Communication Services	9.4%	6.9%
Healthcare	9.3%	5.6%
Industrials	8.1%	15.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	7.7%
Energy	4.1%	14.4%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.0%
Utilities	1.8%	0.3%

Return for Risk

FVAL vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVAL

FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 79
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

AVLV

AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 91
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVAL vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVAL	AVLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	3.18	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	4.39	-0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.57	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	6.09	-2.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.80	24.39	-8.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVAL vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVAL and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVAL	AVLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	3.18	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.86	-0.05

Drawdowns

FVAL vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and AVLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVAL	AVLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-19.50%	-17.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-6.39%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-19.50%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	0.00%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-3.93%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.59%	+0.40%

Volatility

FVAL vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 2.70%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVAL	AVLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	3.12%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	9.04%	-0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	12.29%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	17.35%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	17.35%	+0.76%

FVAL vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FVAL and AVLV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FVAL vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.07%	1.33%	1.58%	1.85%	2.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	1.49%	1.61%	1.60%	1.69%	1.79%	1.41%	1.61%	1.77%	2.06%	1.62%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVAL and AVLV in my portfolio?

FVAL and AVLV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FVAL or AVLV?

AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FVAL (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVAL dropped -37.26% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

Which ETF is better, FVAL or AVLV?

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 20.96% for FVAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FVAL or AVLV?

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 20.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FVAL or AVLV?

FVAL and AVLV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FVAL or AVLV?

FVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

What is the main difference between FVAL and AVLV?

FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and American Century.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.