PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVLV vs. DFLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVLV vs. DFLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than DFLV's 15.66% return.


AVLV

1D
-1.02%
1M
1.99%
YTD
20.57%
6M
19.54%
1Y
37.53%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
10Y*

DFLV

1D
-0.95%
1M
1.70%
YTD
15.66%
6M
14.88%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVLV vs. DFLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.57%15.12%17.49%17.43%-1.78%
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
15.66%15.90%12.88%12.31%-0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLV and DFLV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022

0.94

The correlation between AVLV and DFLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLV vs. DFLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVLV
DFLV

Technology

17.2%
16.2%

Financial Services

16.3%
20.2%

Industrials

15.4%
13.0%

Energy

14.4%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

6.9%
4.2%

Healthcare

5.6%
13.4%

Basic Materials

2.0%
6.8%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.1%
0.3%

Technology

AVLV
17.2%
DFLV
16.2%

Financial Services

AVLV
16.3%
DFLV
20.2%

Industrials

AVLV
15.4%
DFLV
13.0%

Energy

AVLV
14.4%
DFLV
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AVLV
14.1%
DFLV
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

AVLV
7.7%
DFLV
4.5%

Communication Services

AVLV
6.9%
DFLV
4.2%

Healthcare

AVLV
5.6%
DFLV
13.4%

Basic Materials

AVLV
2.0%
DFLV
6.8%

Utilities

AVLV
0.3%
DFLV

-

Real Estate

AVLV
0.1%
DFLV
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVLV vs. DFLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLV
DFLV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVLV vs. DFLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVLVDFLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.48

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.90

5.63

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.36

19.53

+3.82

AVLV vs. DFLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the DFLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLV and DFLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVLV vs. DFLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, which is greater than DFLV's maximum drawdown of -16.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and DFLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLVDFLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-16.80%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-5.48%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-16.80%

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.40%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-3.04%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.58%

+0.03%

Volatility

AVLV vs. DFLV - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) at 3.79%. This indicates that AVLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVLVDFLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

3.79%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

8.42%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

11.54%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

14.22%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.33%

14.22%

+3.11%

AVLV vs. DFLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVLV vs. DFLV - Dividend Comparison

AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than DFLV's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.38%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
1.41%1.61%1.65%1.72%0.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AVLV and DFLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVLV has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to DFLV (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs DFLV's -16.80%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 22.67% vs 18.89% for DFLV. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DFLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 22.67% return vs 18.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFLV.

DFLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.38% for AVLV.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.22% for DFLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVLV and DFLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer