FTIF vs. CIBR
FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTIF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTIF returned 16.19%/yr vs 28.32%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FTIF vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
FTIF
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 25.81%
- 6M
- 24.44%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
FTIF vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 25.81% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.52% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 33.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTIF and CIBR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023 | 0.43 |
The correlation between FTIF and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTIF vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTIF
CIBR
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
FTIF
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FTIF
CIBR
-
Industrials
FTIF
CIBR
Real Estate
FTIF
CIBR
-
Technology
FTIF
CIBR
Consumer Cyclical
FTIF
CIBR
-
Communication Services
FTIF
-
CIBR
Consumer Defensive
FTIF
-
CIBR
-
Financial Services
FTIF
-
CIBR
-
Healthcare
FTIF
-
CIBR
-
Utilities
FTIF
-
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTIF vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FTIF
CIBR
FTIF vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTIF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.20 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.79 | 1.18 | +5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.14 | 2.79 | +17.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTIF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.06 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.67 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
FTIF vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTIF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -33.89% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.46% | -21.99% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -21.99% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -2.81% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -8.66% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 9.25% | -7.41% |
Volatility
FTIF vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) is 4.05%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FTIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTIF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 10.90% | -6.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 20.90% | -10.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 24.50% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 24.95% | -5.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 23.60% | -4.64% |
FTIF vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FTIF and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FTIF vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.11% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTIF and CIBR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FTIF (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIF dropped -27.83% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 3-year performance, CIBR leads with 28.32% vs 16.19% for FTIF. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 28.32% return vs 16.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTIF and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
FTIF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTIF and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer