FOA vs. LFVN
FOA (Finance Of America Companies Inc.) and LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) are both stocks. FOA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, FOA returned -28.59%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for LFVN. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FOA vs. LFVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOA achieves a -21.15% return, which is significantly lower than LFVN's 37.26% return.
FOA
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- -21.15%
- 6M
- -18.56%
- 1Y
- -9.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- -28.59%
- 10Y*
- —
LFVN
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- 63.22%
- YTD
- 37.26%
- 6M
- 23.25%
- 1Y
- -33.52%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- -3.18%
FOA vs. LFVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOA Finance Of America Companies Inc. | -21.15% | -13.90% | 155.64% | -13.39% | -68.01% | -61.83% | 3.69% | 3.56% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 37.26% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 41.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOA and LFVN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between FOA and LFVN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FOA:
$4.39
LFVN:
$0.45
FOA:
4.35
LFVN:
18.62
FOA:
0.03
LFVN:
0.46
FOA:
0.11
LFVN:
0.55
FOA:
$1.15B
LFVN:
$195.32M
FOA:
$623.72M
LFVN:
$152.62M
FOA:
$1.78B
LFVN:
$8.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOA vs. LFVN — Risk / Return Rank
FOA
LFVN
FOA vs. LFVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOA | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | -0.49 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.02 | -0.37 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.96 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | -0.47 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | -0.69 | +0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOA | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | -0.49 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.06 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | -0.04 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
FOA vs. LFVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOA drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, roughly equal to the maximum LFVN drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOA and LFVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOA | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.13% | -99.57% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.07% | -71.73% | +26.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.83% | -83.90% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.62% | -83.90% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.57% | -91.46% | +7.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.40% | -89.58% | +32.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.56% | 48.37% | -24.81% |
Volatility
FOA vs. LFVN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) is 13.40%, while LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a volatility of 40.56%. This indicates that FOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOA | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 40.56% | -27.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.60% | 57.45% | -24.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.37% | 69.28% | -21.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.46% | 64.55% | +12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.49% | 61.20% | +4.29% |
Dividends
FOA vs. LFVN - Dividend Comparison
FOA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOA Finance Of America Companies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.22% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
Financials
FOA vs. LFVN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finance Of America Companies Inc. and LifeVantage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FOA and LFVN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (40.56%) compared to FOA (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOA dropped -96.13% vs LFVN's -99.57%.
FOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOA and LFVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer