PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOA vs. LFVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FOA vs. LFVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOA achieves a -21.15% return, which is significantly lower than LFVN's 37.26% return.


FOA

1D
-1.19%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
-21.15%
6M
-18.56%
1Y
-9.78%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
-28.59%
10Y*

LFVN

1D
-3.48%
1M
63.22%
YTD
37.26%
6M
23.25%
1Y
-33.52%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
-3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOA vs. LFVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOA
Finance Of America Companies Inc.
-21.15%-13.90%155.64%-13.39%-68.01%-61.83%3.69%3.56%
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
37.26%-64.29%197.21%74.03%-39.78%-32.19%-40.29%41.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FOA and LFVN is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.11

The correlation between FOA and LFVN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FOA:

$4.39

LFVN:

$0.45

PE Ratio

FOA:

4.35

LFVN:

18.62

PEG Ratio

FOA:

0.03

LFVN:

0.46

PS Ratio

FOA:

0.11

LFVN:

0.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

FOA:

$1.15B

LFVN:

$195.32M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FOA:

$623.72M

LFVN:

$152.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

FOA:

$1.78B

LFVN:

$8.69M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOA vs. LFVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOA
FOA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LFVN
LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOA vs. LFVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOALFVNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

-0.49

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

-0.37

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.96

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

-0.47

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.42

-0.69

+0.28

FOA vs. LFVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOA Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the LFVN Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOA and LFVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOALFVNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

-0.49

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

0.06

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

-0.04

-0.27

Drawdowns

FOA vs. LFVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOA drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, roughly equal to the maximum LFVN drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOA and LFVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOALFVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.13%

-99.57%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.07%

-71.73%

+26.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.83%

-83.90%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.62%

-83.90%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.57%

-91.46%

+7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.40%

-89.58%

+32.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.56%

48.37%

-24.81%

Volatility

FOA vs. LFVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) is 13.40%, while LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a volatility of 40.56%. This indicates that FOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOALFVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

40.56%

-27.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.60%

57.45%

-24.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.37%

69.28%

-21.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.46%

64.55%

+12.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.49%

61.20%

+4.29%

Dividends

FOA vs. LFVN - Dividend Comparison

FOA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FOA
Finance Of America Companies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
2.22%2.84%0.88%8.33%2.42%

Financials

FOA vs. LFVN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finance Of America Companies Inc. and LifeVantage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M202220232024202520260
43.72M
(FOA) Total Revenue
(LFVN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FOA and LFVN have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFVN has higher volatility (40.56%) compared to FOA (13.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOA dropped -96.13% vs LFVN's -99.57%.

FOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOA and LFVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer