PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNK vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNK vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 22.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNK having a 10.03% annualized return and VTWV not far ahead at 10.42%.


FNK

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.77%
6M
9.21%
YTD
14.72%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.03%
ALL TIME*
9.34%

VTWV

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.07%
6M
15.09%
YTD
22.89%
1Y
43.58%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$141.83K$192.54K$284.84K
$6.82M$6.63M$5.67M

FNK vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
14.72%5.65%6.65%21.03%-7.24%33.60%1.23%20.56%-14.72%11.81%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
22.89%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FNK and VTWV is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.87

The correlation between FNK and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNK vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNK
VTWV

Financial Services

26.5%
27.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.8%
10.1%

Industrials

10.2%
12.0%

Energy

8.8%
5.6%

Real Estate

7.1%
11.3%

Technology

7.1%
7.3%

Basic Materials

6.2%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
3.2%

Utilities

4.9%
5.1%

Healthcare

4.4%
10.9%

Communication Services

1.3%
2.5%

Financial Services

FNK
26.5%
VTWV
27.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FNK
16.8%
VTWV
10.1%

Industrials

FNK
10.2%
VTWV
12.0%

Energy

FNK
8.8%
VTWV
5.6%

Real Estate

FNK
7.1%
VTWV
11.3%

Technology

FNK
7.1%
VTWV
7.3%

Basic Materials

FNK
6.2%
VTWV
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

FNK
5.3%
VTWV
3.2%

Utilities

FNK
4.9%
VTWV
5.1%

Healthcare

FNK
4.4%
VTWV
10.9%

Communication Services

FNK
1.3%
VTWV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNK vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNK
FNK Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNK vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNKVTWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.73

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.45

17.24

-9.79

FNK vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNK and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNK vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than VTWV's maximum drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNKVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.70%

-45.73%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-8.64%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-26.72%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-26.72%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.70%

-45.73%

-4.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.38%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-7.74%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.37%

+0.69%

Volatility

FNK vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) at 3.31%. This indicates that FNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNKVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.31%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

12.16%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

17.75%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.89%

21.53%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.75%

23.48%

+0.27%

FNK vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNK vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than VTWV's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.43%1.53%1.63%1.76%1.66%1.27%1.61%1.82%1.76%1.40%1.38%1.45%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.60%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNK and VTWV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNK has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to VTWV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNK dropped -50.70% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.42% vs 10.03% for FNK. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.42% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.43% for FNK.

FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNK and 0.06% for VTWV.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNK and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer