FNK vs. GETGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and GETGX (Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund) are both funds - FNK is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while GETGX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, FNK returned 9.29%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for GETGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNK charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for GETGX.

Performance

FNK vs. GETGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund (GETGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than GETGX's 10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FNK has underperformed GETGX with an annualized return of 9.29%, while GETGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.

FNK

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 6M: 7.56%
• 1Y: 19.55%
• 3Y*: 13.11%
• 5Y*: 6.97%
• 10Y*: 9.29%

GETGX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 10.89%
• 6M: 10.43%
• 1Y: 15.70%
• 3Y*: 11.09%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 10.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNK vs. GETGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	7.22%	5.65%	6.65%	21.03%	-7.24%	33.60%	1.23%	20.56%	-14.72%	11.81%
GETGX Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund	10.89%	2.11%	9.53%	9.86%	-3.05%	31.20%	7.56%	28.10%	-10.50%	15.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FNK and GETGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011	0.89

The correlation between FNK and GETGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNK vs. GETGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNK

FNK Risk / Return Rank: 38
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 39

GETGX

GETGX Risk / Return Rank: 26
GETGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
GETGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GETGX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
GETGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GETGX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNK vs. GETGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund (GETGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNK	GETGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.35	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.07	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.22	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	6.85	-0.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNK vs. GETGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the GETGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNK and GETGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNK	GETGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.35	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.39	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.54	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.62	-0.22

Drawdowns

FNK vs. GETGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, roughly equal to the maximum GETGX drawdown of -49.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and GETGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNK	GETGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.70%	-49.09%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-7.50%	-1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.16%	-20.42%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-20.42%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.70%	-41.06%	-9.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	0.00%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-5.51%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	2.42%	+0.73%

Volatility

FNK vs. GETGX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund (GETGX) at 3.10%. This indicates that FNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GETGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNK	GETGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	3.10%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.69%	8.73%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.36%	12.35%	+3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.04%	17.06%	+3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.86%	19.25%	+4.61%

FNK vs. GETGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GETGX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNK vs. GETGX - Dividend Comparison

FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than GETGX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.56%	1.53%	1.63%	1.76%	1.66%	1.27%	1.61%	1.82%	1.76%	1.40%	1.38%	1.45%
GETGX Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund	4.33%	4.39%	11.30%	5.79%	7.89%	8.04%	5.12%	5.70%	10.23%	2.89%	1.20%	11.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNK and GETGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FNK and GETGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNK or GETGX?

FNK has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to GETGX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNK dropped -50.70% vs GETGX's -49.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GETGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.