PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNK vs. FLQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNK vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's 1.21% return.


FNK

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.68%
YTD
7.22%
6M
7.56%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
9.29%

FLQM

1D
0.02%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.13%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
11.25%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNK vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
7.22%5.65%6.65%21.03%-7.24%33.60%1.23%20.56%-14.72%9.90%
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.21%5.16%14.32%17.47%-12.95%28.76%15.50%28.56%-4.24%10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FNK and FLQM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.79

The correlation between FNK and FLQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNK vs. FLQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNK
FLQM

Financial Services

25.2%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
18.7%

Industrials

12.8%
18.4%

Energy

8.4%
5.4%

Real Estate

7.5%
4.4%

Technology

7.1%
12.4%

Healthcare

5.3%
12.2%

Utilities

4.4%
1.6%

Basic Materials

4.0%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
7.7%

Communication Services

1.3%
3.3%

Financial Services

FNK
25.2%
FLQM
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FNK
19.0%
FLQM
18.7%

Industrials

FNK
12.8%
FLQM
18.4%

Energy

FNK
8.4%
FLQM
5.4%

Real Estate

FNK
7.5%
FLQM
4.4%

Technology

FNK
7.1%
FLQM
12.4%

Healthcare

FNK
5.3%
FLQM
12.2%

Utilities

FNK
4.4%
FLQM
1.6%

Basic Materials

FNK
4.0%
FLQM
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

FNK
3.5%
FLQM
7.7%

Communication Services

FNK
1.3%
FLQM
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNK vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNK
FNK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNK vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNKFLQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.10

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

0.90

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

2.51

+3.72

FNK vs. FLQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the FLQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNK and FLQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNKFLQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.56

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.41

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.58

-0.18

Drawdowns

FNK vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than FLQM's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and FLQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNKFLQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.70%

-37.26%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-7.57%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-19.70%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-22.51%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-2.85%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-4.92%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.71%

+0.44%

Volatility

FNK vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) at 2.75%. This indicates that FNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNKFLQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

2.75%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

8.34%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

12.18%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

16.39%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.86%

18.48%

+5.38%

FNK vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNK vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison

FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than FLQM's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.51%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%0.00%0.00%
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.56%1.53%1.63%1.76%1.66%1.27%1.61%1.82%1.76%1.40%1.38%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNK and FLQM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNK has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to FLQM (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNK dropped -50.70% vs FLQM's -37.26%.

On 5-year performance, FNK leads with 6.97% vs 6.76% for FLQM. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNK has performed better with a 6.97% return vs 6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.

FNK has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.51% for FLQM.

FNK is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FLQM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNK and 0.30% for FLQM.

FNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNK and FLQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer