FNK vs. DISV
FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNK is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while DISV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. FNK is passively managed, while DISV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNK returned 13.25%/yr vs 24.79%/yr for DISV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for DISV.
Performance
FNK vs. DISV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly lower than DISV's 12.02% return.
FNK
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
DISV
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNK vs. DISV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 7.63% | 5.65% | 6.65% | 21.03% | -6.60% |
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 12.02% | 47.42% | 5.87% | 19.52% | -9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNK and DISV is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FNK and DISV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FNK vs. DISV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNK
DISV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
FNK
DISV
Consumer Cyclical
FNK
DISV
Industrials
FNK
DISV
Energy
FNK
DISV
Real Estate
FNK
DISV
Technology
FNK
DISV
Healthcare
FNK
DISV
Utilities
FNK
DISV
Basic Materials
FNK
DISV
Consumer Defensive
FNK
DISV
Communication Services
FNK
DISV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNK vs. DISV — Risk / Return Rank
FNK
DISV
FNK vs. DISV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNK | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.42 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 3.32 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.90 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 10.98 | -4.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNK | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.42 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.95 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
FNK vs. DISV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than DISV's maximum drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and DISV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNK | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -26.77% | -23.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -12.69% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -14.15% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.44% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -4.90% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.35% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FNK vs. DISV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) is 3.73%, while Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that FNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DISV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNK | DISV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 4.20% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 11.64% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 14.47% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 17.36% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 17.36% | +6.51% |
FNK vs. DISV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DISV's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNK vs. DISV - Dividend Comparison
FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than DISV's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.36% | 2.69% | 2.77% | 2.73% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.56% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNK and DISV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DISV has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FNK (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNK dropped -50.70% vs DISV's -26.77%.
On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 24.79% vs 13.25% for FNK. On fees, DISV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, FNK has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 24.79% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DISV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.
DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 1.56% for FNK.
FNK is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DISV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNK and 0.42% for DISV.
DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNK and DISV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer