FNGO vs. BULZ
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).
FNGO and BULZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGO is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). It was launched on Aug 1, 2018. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. Both FNGO and BULZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGO or BULZ.
Correlation
The correlation between FNGO and BULZ is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FNGO vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FNGO:
39.30%
BULZ:
65.46%
FNGO:
-2.25%
BULZ:
-4.75%
FNGO:
-2.25%
BULZ:
0.00%
Returns By Period
FNGO
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BULZ
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGO vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNGO and BULZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGO vs. BULZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FNGO
BULZ
FNGO vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FNGO vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNGO nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FNGO vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -2.25%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -4.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and BULZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FNGO vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...