PortfoliosLab logo
FNGU vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and QQQ is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FNGU vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FNGU:

11.40%

QQQ:

25.14%

Max Drawdown

FNGU:

-1.15%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

FNGU:

-0.53%

QQQ:

-9.42%

Returns By Period


FNGU

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

-4.41%

1M

7.39%

6M

-4.80%

1Y

11.06%

5Y*

17.86%

10Y*

17.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGU vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGU vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNGU vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FNGU vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.61%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -1.15%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FNGU vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...