FNGAX vs. FNGO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNGAX (Franklin International Growth Fund Class A) and FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) are both funds - FNGAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FNGO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). Over the past 5 years, FNGAX returned -3.60%/yr vs 22.32%/yr for FNGO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGAX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGO.

Performance

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than FNGO's 6.64% return.

FNGAX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: -0.92%
• 1Y: -0.15%
• 3Y*: 4.43%
• 5Y*: -3.60%
• 10Y*: 6.90%

FNGO

• 1D: -4.61%
• 1M: -6.82%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 25.87%
• 3Y*: 48.86%
• 5Y*: 22.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A	-0.23%	10.48%	0.37%	15.00%	-32.05%	1.17%	32.56%	36.91%	-19.33%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	6.64%	25.49%	101.65%	240.10%	-71.55%	28.38%	238.00%	79.61%	-39.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGAX and FNGO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018	0.66

The correlation between FNGAX and FNGO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNGAX vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGAX

FNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 18
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGAX	FNGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	0.59	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	1.07	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.13	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	0.61	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.20	1.56	-1.36

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGAX and FNGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and FNGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGAX	FNGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-78.39%	+25.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-42.73%	+25.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.26%	-47.64%	+24.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.24%	-78.39%	+31.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.23%	-20.15%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.18%	-23.84%	+9.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.24%	16.61%	-10.37%

Volatility

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) is 6.04%, while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a volatility of 21.56%. This indicates that FNGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGAX	FNGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	21.56%	-15.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	35.31%	-20.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.93%	43.90%	-25.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.46%	60.80%	-39.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.33%	61.71%	-41.38%

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGAX vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A	3.27%	3.36%	1.86%	0.00%	1.75%	1.80%	2.22%	0.13%	1.94%	1.31%	0.53%	0.01%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGAX and FNGO in my portfolio?

FNGAX and FNGO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGAX or FNGO?

FNGO has higher volatility (21.56%) compared to FNGAX (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGAX dropped -53.35% vs FNGO's -78.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.