FNGAX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FNGAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FNGAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNGAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | -12.38% | 10.48% | 0.37% | 15.00% | -32.05% | 1.17% | 32.56% | 36.91% | -14.53% | 36.80% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a -12.38% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGAX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.22%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.
FNGAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -12.54%
- YTD
- -12.38%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- -1.17%
- 3Y*
- -0.16%
- 5Y*
- -4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNGAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FNGAX
VOO
FNGAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | 0.98 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | 1.50 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 1.53 | -1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 7.29 | -8.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 0.98 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.70 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.78 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.83 | -0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGAX and VOO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNGAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | 3.72% | 3.36% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 0.13% | 1.94% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.01% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FNGAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -33.99% | -19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -11.98% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.24% | -24.52% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.24% | -33.99% | -13.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.82% | -6.29% | -24.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -3.72% | -10.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 2.52% | +2.38% |
Volatility
FNGAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.29%. This indicates that FNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNGAX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 5.29% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 9.44% | +2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 18.10% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 16.82% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 17.99% | +2.19% |