FNGAX vs. TQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ).
FNGAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2008. TQQQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010.
Performance
FNGAX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNGAX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | -9.38% | 10.48% | 0.37% | 15.00% | -32.05% | 1.17% | 32.56% | 36.91% | -14.53% | 36.80% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | -17.87% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -17.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGAX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 5.58%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 35.31% annualized return.
FNGAX
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- -9.38%
- 6M
- -11.57%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- 0.97%
- 5Y*
- -4.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.58%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- -12.88%
- YTD
- -17.87%
- 6M
- -17.28%
- 1Y
- 48.52%
- 3Y*
- 46.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 35.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGAX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNGAX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FNGAX
TQQQ
FNGAX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGAX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.11 | 0.72 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.30 | 1.41 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.20 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 1.41 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 4.28 | -4.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGAX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | 0.72 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.20 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.54 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.65 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGAX and TQQQ is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FNGAX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than TQQQ's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | 3.60% | 3.36% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 0.13% | 1.94% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.01% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.73% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
FNGAX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and TQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGAX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -81.66% | +28.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -36.97% | +19.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.24% | -81.66% | +34.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.24% | -81.66% | +34.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.45% | -28.08% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -18.66% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 12.13% | -7.15% |
Volatility
FNGAX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) is 7.58%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that FNGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNGAX | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 19.74% | -12.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 38.50% | -25.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 67.35% | -47.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.24% | 66.53% | -45.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 65.83% | -45.62% |