PortfoliosLab logo
FNGAX vs. MGRAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNGAX and MGRAX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FNGAX vs. MGRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNGAX:

0.40

MGRAX:

1.10

Sortino Ratio

FNGAX:

0.60

MGRAX:

1.43

Omega Ratio

FNGAX:

1.08

MGRAX:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

FNGAX:

0.18

MGRAX:

1.09

Martin Ratio

FNGAX:

1.20

MGRAX:

3.38

Ulcer Index

FNGAX:

5.53%

MGRAX:

4.29%

Daily Std Dev

FNGAX:

20.32%

MGRAX:

14.69%

Max Drawdown

FNGAX:

-47.24%

MGRAX:

-54.87%

Current Drawdown

FNGAX:

-21.47%

MGRAX:

-0.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than MGRAX's 12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGAX has underperformed MGRAX with an annualized return of 5.55%, while MGRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.94% annualized return.


FNGAX

YTD

9.89%

1M

6.41%

6M

4.38%

1Y

8.12%

3Y*

5.25%

5Y*

2.86%

10Y*

5.55%

MGRAX

YTD

12.36%

1M

3.93%

6M

10.04%

1Y

16.10%

3Y*

11.16%

5Y*

10.44%

10Y*

7.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFS International Growth Fund

FNGAX vs. MGRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than MGRAX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNGAX vs. MGRAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGAX is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGAX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGAX is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGAX is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGAX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGAX is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MGRAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MGRAX is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MGRAX is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MGRAX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MGRAX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MGRAX is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MGRAX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNGAX vs. MGRAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FNGAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the MGRAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGAX and MGRAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FNGAX vs. MGRAX - Dividend Comparison

FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than MGRAX's 5.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FNGAX
Franklin International Growth Fund Class A
1.79%1.86%0.00%1.75%1.80%2.22%0.13%1.94%1.31%0.53%0.01%0.97%
MGRAX
MFS International Growth Fund
5.33%5.99%2.56%2.69%6.62%0.56%1.42%3.82%2.26%1.01%1.06%2.26%

Drawdowns

FNGAX vs. MGRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, smaller than the maximum MGRAX drawdown of -54.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and MGRAX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FNGAX vs. MGRAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) at 2.78%. This indicates that FNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...