FNGAX vs. YINN

In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than YINN's 24.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FNGAX has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of 5.55%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -28.31% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FNGAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the YINN Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGAX and YINN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than YINN's 1.65% yield.

The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -47.24%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and YINN.

The current volatility for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) is 4.24%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a volatility of 19.59%. This indicates that FNGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.