FNDF vs. MFDX

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) and MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FNDF tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net) while MFDX tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDF returned 14.22%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for MFDX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FNDF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MFDX.

Performance

FNDF vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly higher than MFDX's 12.09% return.

FNDF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 2.05%
• 6M: 10.61%
• YTD: 21.52%
• 1Y: 39.70%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 14.22%
• 10Y*: 11.87%
• ALL TIME*: 9.15%

MFDX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.26%
• 6M: 4.31%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 1Y: 23.13%
• 3Y*: 18.44%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	$80.54M	$73.00M	$75.40M
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	$1.11M	$772.80K	$745.84K

FNDF vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	21.52%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	7.68%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	12.09%	34.27%	4.40%	17.54%	-10.27%	11.07%	6.90%	19.88%	-14.88%	7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and MFDX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.96

The correlation between FNDF and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDF	MFDX
Financial Services	20.2%	15.3%
Industrials	12.8%	19.0%
Technology	11.5%	10.6%
Energy	10.6%	6.4%
Basic Materials	10.0%	10.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	8.6%
Healthcare	6.0%	6.9%
Utilities	4.3%	6.3%
Communication Services	3.4%	6.3%
Real Estate	0.9%	2.3%

Return for Risk

FNDF vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 88
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MFDX

MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 58
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDF vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDF	MFDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.61	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.28	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.29	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	2.18	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.18	8.31	+4.87

FNDF vs. MFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the MFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and MFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than MFDX's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and MFDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDF	MFDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-36.05%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-10.66%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-11.62%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	-25.58%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	0.00%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-6.41%	-1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.79%	+0.23%

Volatility

FNDF vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDF	MFDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	4.18%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	12.45%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	14.40%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.34%	15.11%	+1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.44%	16.40%	+1.04%

FNDF vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDF vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than MFDX's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	3.00%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	2.86%	2.97%	3.16%	3.12%	2.85%	2.99%	1.58%	2.88%	2.13%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDF and MFDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FNDF and MFDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDF or MFDX?

MFDX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to FNDF (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs MFDX's -36.05%.

Which ETF is better, FNDF or MFDX?

On 5-year performance, FNDF leads with 14.22% vs 10.64% for MFDX. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDF or MFDX?

Over the 5-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDF or MFDX?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDF or MFDX?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.86% for MFDX.

What is the main difference between FNDF and MFDX?

FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.39% for MFDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.