FNDF vs. VEA
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA).
FNDF and VEA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. VEA is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Jul 20, 2007. Both FNDF and VEA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDF or VEA.
Performance
FNDF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 5.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDF having a 5.42% annualized return and VEA not far behind at 5.25%.
FNDF
4.71%
-1.88%
-2.11%
10.56%
7.34%
5.42%
VEA
5.20%
-1.96%
-1.17%
11.93%
6.00%
5.25%
Key characteristics
| FNDF | VEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.84 | 0.93 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.17 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.27 | 1.45 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.84 | 4.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.75% | 2.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.61% | 12.79% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.14% | -60.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.19% | -7.15% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDF vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and VEA is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than VEA's 3.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.11% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% | 0.48% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 3.03% | 3.16% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% | 3.68% | 2.60% |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and VEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 3.55%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.