FNDF vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
FNDF and SCHF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both FNDF and SCHF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDF or SCHF.
Key characteristics
| FNDF | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.07% | 4.22% |
| 1Y Return | 16.13% | 12.23% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.17% | 2.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.94% | 6.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.91% | 4.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.26 | 0.97 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.44% | 12.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.14% | -34.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.87% | -1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and SCHF is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNDF vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 4.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDF having a 4.91% annualized return and SCHF not far behind at 4.69%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDF vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDF vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDF vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SCHF's 2.85% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.25% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 0.48% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.85% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% | 2.90% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and SCHF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDF vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.