FNDF vs. DFIV
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV).
FNDF and DFIV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. DFIV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 16, 1999.
Performance
FNDF vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDF vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | -0.93% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 5.98% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 5.98% return.
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
DFIV
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 38.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDF vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
DFIV
FNDF vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDF | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 2.25 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 2.94 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 3.08 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 13.72 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDF | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.25 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.89 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and DFIV is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDF vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than DFIV's 2.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.69% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and DFIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -25.42% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -12.12% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -5.95% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -4.58% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.72% | +0.11% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 6.81%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 6.81% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 10.46% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 17.16% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 16.71% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 16.71% | +0.93% |