FNDB vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FNDB tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index while GCOW tracks the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDB returned 14.04%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for GCOW. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

FNDB vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 14.04%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.98% annualized return.

FNDB

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 33.19%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 14.04%

GCOW

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 14.84%
• 1Y: 27.37%
• 3Y*: 17.63%
• 5Y*: 12.63%
• 10Y*: 9.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	14.63%	16.23%	16.25%	18.42%	-7.53%	31.55%	9.40%	28.88%	-8.20%	16.94%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.82%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.99%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and GCOW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.76

The correlation between FNDB and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDB vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDB	GCOW
Technology	18.8%	0.9%
Financial Services	14.1%	-
Healthcare	11.6%	14.6%
Industrials	10.0%	12.4%
Energy	10.0%	24.4%
Communication Services	9.7%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	17.1%
Basic Materials	3.8%	7.3%
Utilities	3.1%	4.1%
Real Estate	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

FNDB vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB

FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 89
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 89

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 80
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDB	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	2.55	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	3.66	+0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.44	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.32	5.98	-0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.48	15.85	+4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDB vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDB	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11	2.55	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.94	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.62	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.59	+0.20

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, roughly equal to the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDB	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.17%	-37.64%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-4.77%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-12.35%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.29%	-21.48%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.17%	-37.64%	-0.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.18%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-5.84%	+2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	1.80%	-0.17%

Volatility

FNDB vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) is 2.51%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that FNDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDB	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	2.94%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.62%	7.97%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	10.82%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	13.48%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	16.20%	+1.28%

FNDB vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDB vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than GCOW's 4.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	1.44%	1.62%	1.74%	1.80%	1.98%	1.63%	2.15%	2.23%	2.41%	1.91%	2.06%	2.26%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.41%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDB and GCOW in my portfolio?

FNDB and GCOW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDB or GCOW?

GCOW has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FNDB (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which ETF is better, FNDB or GCOW?

On 10-year performance, FNDB leads with 14.04% vs 9.98% for GCOW. On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDB or GCOW?

Over the 10-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDB or GCOW?

FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDB or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 1.44% for FNDB.

What is the main difference between FNDB and GCOW?

FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.60% for GCOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.