PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDB vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDB vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 14.26%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.


FNDB

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.73%
YTD
14.40%
6M
13.78%
1Y
30.50%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
14.26%

SPY

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.20%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
14.40%16.23%16.25%18.42%-7.53%31.55%9.40%28.88%-8.20%16.94%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.15%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and SPY is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.90

The correlation between FNDB and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDB vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDB
SPY

Technology

20.8%
39.0%

Financial Services

12.7%
11.1%

Healthcare

11.9%
8.3%

Industrials

10.0%
7.8%

Energy

9.3%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.9%

Communication Services

8.9%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.7%

Utilities

3.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Technology

FNDB
20.8%
SPY
39.0%

Financial Services

FNDB
12.7%
SPY
11.1%

Healthcare

FNDB
11.9%
SPY
8.3%

Industrials

FNDB
10.0%
SPY
7.8%

Energy

FNDB
9.3%
SPY
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDB
9.2%
SPY
9.9%

Communication Services

FNDB
8.9%
SPY
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

FNDB
6.9%
SPY
4.5%

Basic Materials

FNDB
3.7%
SPY
1.7%

Utilities

FNDB
3.0%
SPY
2.1%

Real Estate

FNDB
2.2%
SPY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDB vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB
FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDBSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.34

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

2.67

+2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

11.92

+6.60

FNDB vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDBSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.17%

-55.19%

+17.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-8.88%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-18.76%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

-24.50%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.17%

-33.72%

-4.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-3.17%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-9.04%

+5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.98%

-0.33%

Volatility

FNDB vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) is 3.38%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that FNDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDBSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

4.87%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

9.85%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

12.50%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

17.15%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

17.95%

-0.49%

FNDB vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDB vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
1.44%1.62%1.74%1.80%1.98%1.63%2.15%2.23%2.41%1.91%2.06%2.26%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDB and SPY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to FNDB (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.53% vs 14.26% for FNDB. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 14.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.

FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.

FNDB is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.09% for SPY.

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDB and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer