FNDB vs. SCHD
FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDB returned 14.26%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FNDB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.26%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.
FNDB
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 14.40%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
FNDB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 14.40% | 16.23% | 16.25% | 18.42% | -7.53% | 31.55% | 9.40% | 28.88% | -8.20% | 16.94% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDB and SCHD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FNDB and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FNDB vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDB
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FNDB
SCHD
Financial Services
FNDB
SCHD
Healthcare
FNDB
SCHD
Industrials
FNDB
SCHD
Energy
FNDB
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FNDB
SCHD
Communication Services
FNDB
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FNDB
SCHD
Basic Materials
FNDB
SCHD
Utilities
FNDB
SCHD
Real Estate
FNDB
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FNDB
SCHD
FNDB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDB | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.40 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 5.35 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 12.94 | +5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDB | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.17% | -33.37% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | -4.61% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | -16.13% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.29% | -16.85% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.17% | -33.37% | -4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -2.47% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -3.31% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.90% | -0.25% |
Volatility
FNDB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) is 3.38%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that FNDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDB | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 3.58% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 7.73% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 11.07% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 14.36% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 16.71% | +0.75% |
FNDB vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FNDB (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, FNDB leads with 14.26% vs 12.72% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 1.44% for FNDB.
FNDB is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.06% for SCHD.
FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDB and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer