PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDB vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.26%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.


FNDB

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.73%
YTD
14.40%
6M
13.78%
1Y
30.50%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
14.26%

SCHD

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
17.72%
6M
17.25%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
14.40%16.23%16.25%18.42%-7.53%31.55%9.40%28.88%-8.20%16.94%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
17.72%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and SCHD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.90

The correlation between FNDB and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDB vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDB
SCHD

Technology

20.8%
19.4%

Financial Services

12.7%
9.1%

Healthcare

11.9%
18.4%

Industrials

10.0%
7.4%

Energy

9.3%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
6.7%

Communication Services

8.9%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
18.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.2%

Utilities

3.0%
0.0%

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Technology

FNDB
20.8%
SCHD
19.4%

Financial Services

FNDB
12.7%
SCHD
9.1%

Healthcare

FNDB
11.9%
SCHD
18.4%

Industrials

FNDB
10.0%
SCHD
7.4%

Energy

FNDB
9.3%
SCHD
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDB
9.2%
SCHD
6.7%

Communication Services

FNDB
8.9%
SCHD
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

FNDB
6.9%
SCHD
18.5%

Basic Materials

FNDB
3.7%
SCHD
1.2%

Utilities

FNDB
3.0%
SCHD
0.0%

Real Estate

FNDB
2.2%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB
FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDBSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

5.35

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

12.94

+5.58

FNDB vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDBSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.17%

-33.37%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-4.61%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-16.13%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

-16.85%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.17%

-33.37%

-4.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-2.47%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-3.31%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.90%

-0.25%

Volatility

FNDB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) is 3.38%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that FNDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDBSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.58%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

7.73%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

11.07%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

14.36%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

16.71%

+0.75%

FNDB vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
1.44%1.62%1.74%1.80%1.98%1.63%2.15%2.23%2.41%1.91%2.06%2.26%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.30%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FNDB (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, FNDB leads with 14.26% vs 12.72% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 1.44% for FNDB.

FNDB is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.06% for SCHD.

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDB and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer