FNDB vs. VTV
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV).
FNDB and VTV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI US. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013. VTV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both FNDB and VTV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDB or VTV.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDB and VTV is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNDB vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FNDB:
1.72
VTV:
1.77
FNDB:
2.40
VTV:
2.51
FNDB:
1.32
VTV:
1.32
FNDB:
3.04
VTV:
2.46
FNDB:
10.31
VTV:
9.75
FNDB:
1.91%
VTV:
1.88%
FNDB:
11.45%
VTV:
10.36%
FNDB:
-38.17%
VTV:
-59.27%
FNDB:
-5.20%
VTV:
-6.37%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 15.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has outperformed VTV with an annualized return of 13.18%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.
FNDB
17.57%
-2.31%
8.67%
18.49%
14.56%
13.18%
VTV
15.96%
-4.74%
6.38%
16.73%
9.98%
9.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDB vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDB vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDB vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than VTV's 1.72% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 3.35% | 3.47% | 4.12% | 1.66% | 4.51% | 3.21% | 6.24% | 4.95% | 5.29% | 3.29% | 3.38% | 0.48% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.72% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% | 2.22% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
FNDB vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and VTV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDB vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.