FNDB vs. FNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX).
FNDB and FNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI US. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both FNDB and FNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDB or FNDX.
Performance
FNDB vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNDB having a 21.66% return and FNDX slightly higher at 22.09%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDB having a 14.41% annualized return and FNDX not far behind at 14.01%.
FNDB
21.66%
2.63%
13.95%
31.39%
17.98%
14.41%
FNDX
22.09%
2.37%
13.74%
31.33%
17.81%
14.01%
Key characteristics
FNDB | FNDX | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.83 | 2.91 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.88 | 3.97 |
Omega Ratio | 1.52 | 1.53 |
Calmar Ratio | 4.96 | 4.94 |
Martin Ratio | 18.17 | 18.79 |
Ulcer Index | 1.77% | 1.70% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.35% | 10.99% |
Max Drawdown | -38.17% | -37.71% |
Current Drawdown | -0.62% | -0.73% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDB vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNDB and FNDX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDB and FNDX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDB vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDB vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than FNDX's 4.12% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 4.03% | 3.51% | 4.12% | 3.23% | 5.46% | 3.21% | 3.64% | 3.63% | 4.25% | 3.43% | 3.21% | 0.74% |
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 4.12% | 3.75% | 4.20% | 2.37% | 2.29% | 5.67% | 4.97% | 2.63% | 3.96% | 3.85% | 3.36% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
FNDB vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and FNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDB vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) have volatilities of 4.13% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.