FNDB vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDB returned 14.04%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for FNDF. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

FNDB vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 22.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has outperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 14.04%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.01% annualized return.

FNDB

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 33.19%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 14.04%

FNDF

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.57%
• YTD: 22.03%
• 6M: 26.38%
• 1Y: 44.73%
• 3Y*: 24.37%
• 5Y*: 13.68%
• 10Y*: 12.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	14.63%	16.23%	16.25%	18.42%	-7.53%	31.55%	9.40%	28.88%	-8.20%	16.94%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	22.03%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and FNDF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.80

The correlation between FNDB and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDB vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDB	FNDF
Technology	18.8%	11.1%
Financial Services	14.1%	16.7%
Healthcare	11.6%	5.5%
Industrials	10.0%	15.9%
Energy	10.0%	12.3%
Communication Services	9.7%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	6.9%
Basic Materials	3.8%	11.3%
Utilities	3.1%	3.8%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.9%

Return for Risk

FNDB vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB

FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 89
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDB	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	2.99	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	3.89	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.53	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.32	4.38	+0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.48	16.77	+3.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDB vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDB	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11	2.99	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.85	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.68	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.54	+0.25

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDB	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.17%	-40.14%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-10.60%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-13.89%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.29%	-25.56%	+6.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.17%	-40.14%	+1.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-7.65%	+3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	2.77%	-1.14%

Volatility

FNDB vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) is 2.51%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that FNDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDB	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	5.34%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.62%	12.51%	-4.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	15.07%	-4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	16.18%	-0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	17.67%	-0.19%

FNDB vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNDB and FNDF have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDB vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than FNDF's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	1.44%	1.62%	1.74%	1.80%	1.98%	1.63%	2.15%	2.23%	2.41%	1.91%	2.06%	2.26%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	2.82%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDB and FNDF in my portfolio?

FNDB and FNDF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDB or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to FNDB (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, FNDB or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDB leads with 14.04% vs 12.01% for FNDF. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDB or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 12.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDB or FNDF?

FNDB and FNDF have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDB or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.44% for FNDB.

What is the main difference between FNDB and FNDF?

FNDB is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while FNDF tracks Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.