PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDA vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.40%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


FNDA

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.11%
YTD
17.04%
6M
15.17%
1Y
31.82%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
11.40%

SCHG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.09%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
17.04%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
1.35%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and SCHG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.70

The correlation between FNDA and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDA
SCHG

Industrials

19.3%
6.0%

Technology

16.2%
46.7%

Financial Services

14.1%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.4%

Real Estate

9.8%
0.5%

Healthcare

7.1%
8.4%

Energy

5.5%
0.7%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
1.6%

Utilities

2.7%
0.4%

Industrials

FNDA
19.3%
SCHG
6.0%

Technology

FNDA
16.2%
SCHG
46.7%

Financial Services

FNDA
14.1%
SCHG
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDA
12.2%
SCHG
12.4%

Real Estate

FNDA
9.8%
SCHG
0.5%

Healthcare

FNDA
7.1%
SCHG
8.4%

Energy

FNDA
5.5%
SCHG
0.7%

Basic Materials

FNDA
5.2%
SCHG
1.3%

Communication Services

FNDA
4.0%
SCHG
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

FNDA
3.9%
SCHG
1.6%

Utilities

FNDA
2.7%
SCHG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDASCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.10

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

3.58

+7.47

FNDA vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDASCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-34.59%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-16.41%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-23.39%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-34.59%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.64%

-34.59%

-10.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-6.46%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-5.20%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

5.02%

-2.13%

Volatility

FNDA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) is 4.97%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDASCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

5.91%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

12.52%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

16.24%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.89%

22.38%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.58%

+0.78%

FNDA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.07%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDA and SCHG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to FNDA (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 11.40% for FNDA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.04% for SCHG.

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDA and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer