PortfoliosLab logo
FNDA vs. SCHA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and SCHA is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

FNDA vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%220.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
171.65%
156.01%
FNDA
SCHA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FNDA:

0.10

SCHA:

0.17

Sortino Ratio

FNDA:

0.30

SCHA:

0.41

Omega Ratio

FNDA:

1.04

SCHA:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

FNDA:

0.08

SCHA:

0.15

Martin Ratio

FNDA:

0.26

SCHA:

0.47

Ulcer Index

FNDA:

8.35%

SCHA:

8.65%

Daily Std Dev

FNDA:

22.41%

SCHA:

23.69%

Max Drawdown

FNDA:

-44.64%

SCHA:

-42.41%

Current Drawdown

FNDA:

-16.01%

SCHA:

-16.25%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNDA having a -8.79% return and SCHA slightly lower at -8.84%. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 7.94%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.38% annualized return.


FNDA

YTD

-8.79%

1M

4.28%

6M

-7.22%

1Y

-0.47%

5Y*

16.00%

10Y*

7.94%

SCHA

YTD

-8.84%

1M

5.99%

6M

-7.42%

1Y

1.19%

5Y*

12.50%

10Y*

7.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNDA vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Expense ratio chart for FNDA: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FNDA: 0.25%
Expense ratio chart for SCHA: current value is 0.04%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SCHA: 0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNDA vs. SCHA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNDA is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNDA is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNDA is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNDA is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNDA is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNDA is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHA is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHA is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FNDA vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FNDA: 0.10
SCHA: 0.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FNDA: 0.30
SCHA: 0.41
The chart of Omega ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FNDA: 1.04
SCHA: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FNDA: 0.08
SCHA: 0.15
The chart of Martin ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FNDA: 0.26
SCHA: 0.47

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and SCHA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.10
0.17
FNDA
SCHA

Dividends

FNDA vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than SCHA's 1.66% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.58%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.67%1.30%1.19%1.33%1.06%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.66%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.62%1.24%1.50%1.48%1.45%

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.01%
-16.25%
FNDA
SCHA

Volatility

FNDA vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) have volatilities of 14.20% and 14.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.20%
14.85%
FNDA
SCHA