FNDA vs. IFRA
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA).
FNDA and IFRA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. IFRA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2018. Both FNDA and IFRA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDA or IFRA.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and IFRA is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNDA vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FNDA:
0.64
IFRA:
1.19
FNDA:
1.02
IFRA:
1.76
FNDA:
1.13
IFRA:
1.21
FNDA:
1.31
IFRA:
1.77
FNDA:
3.35
IFRA:
5.77
FNDA:
3.53%
IFRA:
3.29%
FNDA:
18.35%
IFRA:
15.91%
FNDA:
-44.64%
IFRA:
-41.06%
FNDA:
-7.66%
IFRA:
-10.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA's 17.09% return.
FNDA
9.69%
-3.25%
10.78%
10.08%
10.24%
9.32%
IFRA
17.09%
-6.87%
10.90%
17.87%
12.32%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDA vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IFRA's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDA vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDA vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than IFRA's 1.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 2.24% | 1.83% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.76% | 2.80% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.99% | 1.33% | 0.58% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.74% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.07% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and IFRA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDA vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 4.75%. This indicates that FNDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.