FNDA vs. LRGF
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF).
FNDA and LRGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. LRGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 30, 2015. Both FNDA and LRGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDA or LRGF.
Performance
FNDA vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly lower than LRGF's 27.46% return.
FNDA
13.15%
2.08%
10.12%
26.49%
11.98%
9.76%
LRGF
27.46%
1.52%
12.14%
35.05%
14.42%
N/A
Key characteristics
| FNDA | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.45 | 2.84 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.12 | 3.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.44 | 4.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.99 | 18.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.37% | 1.94% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.56% | 12.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.64% | -36.03% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.38% | -1.47% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDA vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGF's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and LRGF is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDA vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDA vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than LRGF's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.35% | 1.71% | 1.48% | 2.04% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.67% | 2.00% | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 0.33% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.20% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than LRGF's maximum drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and LRGF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDA vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) at 4.19%. This indicates that FNDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.