PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FNDA vs. IGF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FNDAIGF
YTD Return7.54%14.62%
1Y Return23.42%24.17%
3Y Return (Ann)3.24%6.44%
5Y Return (Ann)10.45%5.35%
10Y Return (Ann)9.30%5.24%
Sharpe Ratio1.602.36
Sortino Ratio2.333.33
Omega Ratio1.281.43
Calmar Ratio1.922.15
Martin Ratio8.9913.48
Ulcer Index3.36%2.15%
Daily Std Dev18.93%12.31%
Max Drawdown-44.64%-58.33%
Current Drawdown-3.29%-4.14%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between FNDA and IGF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FNDA vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 14.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 9.30%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
196.80%
104.18%
FNDA
IGF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNDA vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.46% expense ratio.


IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Expense ratio chart for IGF: current value at 0.46% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.46%
Expense ratio chart for FNDA: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FNDA vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FNDA, currently valued at 8.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.99
IGF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IGF, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IGF, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IGF, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IGF, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IGF, currently valued at 13.48, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0013.48

FNDA vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and IGF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.60
2.36
FNDA
IGF

Dividends

FNDA vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IGF's 3.28% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
2.22%2.74%2.10%1.77%1.81%1.57%3.31%2.29%1.52%2.01%1.55%0.32%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
3.28%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%3.00%3.45%

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and IGF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.29%
-4.14%
FNDA
IGF

Volatility

FNDA vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.26%. This indicates that FNDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.95%
3.26%
FNDA
IGF