^TNX vs. KMB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB).

Performance

^TNX vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^TNX vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years	3.75%	-8.97%	18.29%	-0.34%	156.55%	64.89%	-52.21%	-28.56%	11.68%	-1.68%
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation	-2.10%	-19.86%	11.79%	-7.08%	-1.58%	9.66%	0.95%	24.57%	-2.06%	9.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's -2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TNX has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 9.20%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.12% annualized return.

^TNX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 20.80%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

KMB

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -9.99%
• YTD: -2.10%
• 6M: -18.87%
• 1Y: -28.75%
• 3Y*: -6.54%
• 5Y*: -3.01%
• 10Y*: 0.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^TNX vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TNX

^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 22
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

KMB

KMB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^TNX vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^TNX	KMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	-1.16	+1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	-1.47	+1.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.79	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	-0.92	+1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	-1.49	+1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^TNX vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and KMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^TNX	KMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	-1.16	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	-0.15	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	0.01	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.46	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between ^TNX and KMB is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

^TNX vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -93.78%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and KMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	^TNX	KMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.78%	-36.97%	-56.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.99%	-30.70%	+16.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.74%	-31.73%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.57%	-31.73%	-52.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.17%	-30.86%	-15.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.38%	-8.74%	-42.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.39%	19.08%	-10.69%

Volatility

^TNX vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 5.31%. This indicates that ^TNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^TNX	KMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.89%	5.31%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.58%	21.01%	-10.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.89%	24.97%	-7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.96%	19.79%	+13.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.18%	20.83%	+27.35%