FLTR vs. XEMD
FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLTR returned 5.95%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for XEMD. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.
Performance
FLTR vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD's 2.49% return.
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.76M | $33.35M | $28.52M | |
| $5.44M | $11.46M | $8.01M |
FLTR vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 2.36% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.49% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and XEMD is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
XEMD
FLTR vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLTR | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.96 | 1.36 | +1.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.15 | 2.53 | +13.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 95.31 | 10.95 | +84.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and XEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -10.01% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -3.52% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | -4.23% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.96% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -1.23% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.81% | -0.76% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.17%, while BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a volatility of 0.96%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | 0.96% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.65% | 3.80% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80% | 4.74% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 6.80% | -4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 6.80% | -1.80% |
FLTR vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLTR vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.63% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.82% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and XEMD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XEMD has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to FLTR (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs XEMD's -10.01%.
On 3-year performance, XEMD leads with 10.14% vs 5.95% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XEMD has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 4.63% for FLTR.
FLTR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while XEMD tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.29% for XEMD.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and XEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer