FLTR vs. NLR
FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLTR returned 3.51%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for NLR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
FLTR vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTR has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 3.51%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
NLR
- 1D
- -4.59%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 36.84%
- 3Y*
- 35.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
FLTR vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.91% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 6.14% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and NLR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2011 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
NLR
FLTR vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +11.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.15 | 1.17 | +1.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.96 | 1.43 | +15.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 101.23 | 2.93 | +98.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.77 | 0.88 | +5.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.11 | 0.75 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.57 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.18 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -65.05% | +47.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -25.80% | +25.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | -30.48% | +28.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | -30.48% | +27.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | -34.35% | +16.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -19.80% | +19.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -35.72% | +35.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 12.61% | -12.56% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.25%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 13.18% | -12.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 32.83% | -32.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 42.32% | -41.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 29.24% | -27.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 24.02% | -19.02% |
FLTR vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLTR vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than NLR's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.40% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and NLR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 13.66% vs 3.51% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 13.66% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 2.40% for NLR.
FLTR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.56% for NLR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer