NLR vs. URAN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) are both Uranium funds - NLR tracks the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index while URAN tracks the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NLR returned -2.28% vs -0.25% for URAN. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for URAN.

Performance

NLR vs. URAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -13.99% return, which is significantly lower than URAN's -12.41% return.

NLR

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: -7.05%
• 6M: -28.16%
• YTD: -13.99%
• 1Y: -2.28%
• 3Y*: 23.67%
• 5Y*: 18.29%
• 10Y*: 11.00%
• ALL TIME*: 3.29%

URAN

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -4.79%
• 6M: -26.75%
• YTD: -12.41%
• 1Y: -0.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	$43.05M	$48.38M	$60.74M
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	$140.10K	$486.39K	$433.21K

NLR vs. URAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-13.99%	56.50%	-0.39%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	-12.41%	49.05%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and URAN is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.95

The correlation between NLR and URAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NLR vs. URAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 10
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 11
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 12
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NLR vs. URAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NLR	URAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	-0.05	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	0.22	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.02	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	-0.06	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.26	-0.11	-0.14

NLR vs. URAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the URAN Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and URAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NLR vs. URAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than URAN's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and URAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLR	URAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.05%	-35.21%	-29.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.52%	-35.21%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.01%	-33.51%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.67%	-12.37%	-23.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.42%	17.37%	+0.05%

Volatility

NLR vs. URAN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) at 9.49%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLR	URAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.90%	9.49%	+3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.42%	29.24%	+3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.80%	40.04%	+3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.13%	38.93%	-8.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.58%	38.93%	-14.35%

NLR vs. URAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than URAN's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLR vs. URAN - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than URAN's 2.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.96%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.93%	2.56%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLR and URAN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, NLR and URAN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NLR or URAN?

NLR has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to URAN (9.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs URAN's -35.21%.

Which ETF is better, NLR or URAN?

On 1-year performance, URAN leads with -0.25% vs -2.28% for NLR. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, URAN has been the lower-risk option at 9.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NLR or URAN?

Over the 1-year period, URAN has performed better with a -0.25% return vs -2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NLR or URAN?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NLR or URAN?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.93% for URAN.

What is the main difference between NLR and URAN?

NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.35% for URAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.