NLR vs. NUKZ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ).
NLR and NUKZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. Both NLR and NUKZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NLR or NUKZ.
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and NUKZ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NLR vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NLR:
28.37%
NUKZ:
28.11%
NLR:
-66.96%
NUKZ:
-14.57%
NLR:
-4.61%
NUKZ:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 12.53% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 17.33% return.
NLR
12.53%
11.42%
16.37%
24.61%
15.54%
9.29%
NUKZ
17.33%
15.34%
43.33%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NLR vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NLR vs. NUKZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NLR
NUKZ
NLR vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
NLR vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than NUKZ's 0.08% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 0.67% | 0.75% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NLR vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and NUKZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NLR vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) is 9.89%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 11.25%. This indicates that NLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.