NLR vs. URA
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).
NLR and URA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. Both NLR and URA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NLR or URA.
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and URA is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NLR vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NLR:
0.69
URA:
0.14
NLR:
1.17
URA:
0.46
NLR:
1.14
URA:
1.05
NLR:
0.88
URA:
0.07
NLR:
2.24
URA:
0.41
NLR:
8.45%
URA:
12.51%
NLR:
27.55%
URA:
36.11%
NLR:
-66.96%
URA:
-93.54%
NLR:
-14.39%
URA:
-70.50%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 8.18%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.03% annualized return.
NLR
15.39%
-10.44%
1.27%
16.12%
13.67%
8.18%
URA
1.10%
-15.50%
-5.52%
0.57%
24.35%
5.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NLR vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NLR vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NLR vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
NLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 0.00% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% | 0.69% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.10% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% | 0.54% |
Drawdowns
NLR vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and URA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NLR vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) is 7.94%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 8.64%. This indicates that NLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.