FLRG vs. MGV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLRG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRG returned 12.45%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLRG charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.

Performance

FLRG vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 15.50% return.

FLRG

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 18.22%
• 5Y*: 12.45%
• 10Y*: —

MGV

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 28.69%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRG vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	7.49%	13.92%	23.36%	18.31%	-10.98%	29.36%	9.90%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	15.50%	15.45%	16.94%	9.16%	-1.22%	25.93%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and MGV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020	0.83

The correlation between FLRG and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLRG vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLRG	MGV
Technology	38.8%	14.2%
Financial Services	11.4%	23.9%
Communication Services	9.9%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	3.7%
Healthcare	9.1%	16.6%
Industrials	7.3%	13.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	11.9%
Energy	4.3%	6.6%
Basic Materials	2.3%	2.4%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.2%
Utilities	1.0%	2.6%

Return for Risk

FLRG vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG

FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 54
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

MGV

MGV Risk / Return Rank: 90
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLRG	MGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.76	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.92	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.50	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	4.36	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	16.56	-7.63

FLRG vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and MGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRG	MGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-56.07%	+36.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-6.42%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-13.18%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.64%	-16.54%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	0.00%	-1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-7.78%	+4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.69%	+0.17%

Volatility

FLRG vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.33%. This indicates that FLRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRG	MGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	3.33%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	7.77%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.49%	10.13%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	13.61%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.03%	16.35%	-1.32%

FLRG vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLRG vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than MGV's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF	1.36%	1.42%	1.42%	1.39%	1.62%	1.36%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	1.85%	2.04%	2.31%	2.48%	2.45%	2.17%	2.47%	2.69%	2.65%	2.34%	2.53%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRG and MGV in my portfolio?

FLRG and MGV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLRG or MGV?

FLRG has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to MGV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs MGV's -56.07%.

Which ETF is better, FLRG or MGV?

On 5-year performance, MGV leads with 12.53% vs 12.45% for FLRG. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLRG or MGV?

Over the 5-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 12.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLRG or MGV?

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLRG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLRG or MGV?

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.36% for FLRG.

What is the main difference between FLRG and MGV?

FLRG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLRG and 0.05% for MGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.