FLRG vs. FMIL
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL).
FLRG and FMIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLRG is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index. It was launched on Sep 15, 2020. FMIL is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLRG or FMIL.
Key characteristics
| FLRG | FMIL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 27.78% | 31.93% |
| 1Y Return | 34.23% | 39.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.44% | 17.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.09 | 3.20 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.21 | 4.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.57 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.64 | 4.73 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.31 | 22.78 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.71% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.78% | 13.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.64% | -15.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.79% | -0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRG and FMIL is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FLRG vs. FMIL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 27.78% return, which is significantly lower than FMIL's 31.93% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLRG vs. FMIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLRG vs. FMIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLRG vs. FMIL - Dividend Comparison
FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than FMIL's 0.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | 1.23% | 1.39% | 1.62% | 1.36% | 1.47% |
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF | 0.67% | 0.22% | 1.43% | 1.68% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
FLRG vs. FMIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than FMIL's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and FMIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLRG vs. FMIL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.