PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIG having a 12.98% annualized return and DGRO not far ahead at 13.38%.


VIG

1D
0.41%
1M
0.64%
6M
7.02%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*
12.98%
ALL TIME*
10.24%

DGRO

1D
0.35%
1M
1.32%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.38%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.57M$103.25M$110.55M
$232.65M$242.03M$260.72M

VIG vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
10.16%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.79%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and DGRO is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.96

The correlation between VIG and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIG vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
DGRO

Technology

26.9%
17.3%

Financial Services

20.3%
20.4%

Healthcare

17.8%
17.9%

Industrials

11.9%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
6.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%
2.5%

Utilities

3.0%
7.3%

Energy

3.0%
4.8%

Communication Services

0.5%
0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VIG
26.9%
DGRO
17.3%

Financial Services

VIG
20.3%
DGRO
20.4%

Healthcare

VIG
17.8%
DGRO
17.9%

Industrials

VIG
11.9%
DGRO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
9.2%
DGRO
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.5%
DGRO
6.5%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.4%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

VIG
3.0%
DGRO
7.3%

Energy

VIG
3.0%
DGRO
4.8%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
DGRO
0.1%

Real Estate

VIG

-

DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIG vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIGDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.83

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

14.91

-4.80

VIG vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIG vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-35.10%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-6.47%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-14.03%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-19.31%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-35.10%

+3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.01%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-3.41%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.66%

+0.28%

Volatility

VIG vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.57%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.88%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

7.12%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

9.54%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

13.79%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

16.58%

-0.56%

VIG vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIG vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DGRO's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.49%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VIG and DGRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to VIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.38% vs 12.98% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.49% for VIG.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer