PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. RFDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQL vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than RFDA's 11.40% return.


FLQL

1D
-0.08%
1M
5.00%
YTD
12.66%
6M
12.54%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*

RFDA

1D
-0.92%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.40%
6M
12.25%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
12.66%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%10.67%29.09%-2.79%15.04%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
11.40%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%27.15%-9.27%14.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and RFDA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.85

The correlation between FLQL and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQL vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQL
RFDA

Technology

34.3%
19.9%

Communication Services

12.2%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
7.0%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.8%

Industrials

10.0%
8.9%

Financial Services

9.9%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
7.6%

Real Estate

2.9%
5.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Utilities

1.6%
5.0%

Energy

1.0%
12.5%

Technology

FLQL
34.3%
RFDA
19.9%

Communication Services

FLQL
12.2%
RFDA
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQL
11.5%
RFDA
7.0%

Healthcare

FLQL
10.5%
RFDA
8.8%

Industrials

FLQL
10.0%
RFDA
8.9%

Financial Services

FLQL
9.9%
RFDA
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

FLQL
4.4%
RFDA
7.6%

Real Estate

FLQL
2.9%
RFDA
5.0%

Basic Materials

FLQL
1.7%
RFDA
1.8%

Utilities

FLQL
1.6%
RFDA
5.0%

Energy

FLQL
1.0%
RFDA
12.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQLRFDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

5.44

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.42

19.87

-4.45

FLQL vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQLRFDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.55

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.84

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and RFDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLRFDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-34.60%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-5.45%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-19.35%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-19.35%

-2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.92%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-3.74%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.49%

+0.43%

Volatility

FLQL vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.66%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQLRFDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

2.66%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

8.47%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

11.64%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

15.73%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

16.85%

+0.65%

FLQL vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQL vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%0.00%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.77%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQL and RFDA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLQL has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.70% vs 13.17% for RFDA. On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.01% for FLQL.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQL and RFDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer